Jeffrey Smith The leading consumer advocate promoting healthier, non-GMO choices Posted on 3:02 pm May 25, 2011

Dangerous Toxins From Genetically Modified Plants Found in Women and Fetuses

Watch this two minute video, Double Dipping Danger, produced by Alex Bogusky, and then read about new evidence below showing even more harm from genetically modified foods. Click HERE to play.

When U.S. regulators approved Monsanto’s genetically modified “Bt” corn, they knew it would add a deadly poison into our food supply. That’s what it was designed to do. The corn’s DNA is equipped with a gene from soil bacteria called Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) that produces the Bt-toxin. It’s a pesticide; it breaks open the stomach of certain insects and kills them.

But Monsanto and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) swore up and down that it was only insects that would be hurt. The Bt-toxin, they claimed, would be completely destroyed in the human digestive system and not have any impact on all of us trusting corn-eating consumers.

Oops. A study just proved them wrong.

Doctors at Sherbrooke University Hospital in Quebec found the corn’s Bt-toxin in the blood of pregnant women and their babies, as well as in non-pregnant women.i (Specifically, the toxin was identified in 93% of 30 pregnant women, 80% of umbilical blood in their babies, and 67% of 39 non-pregnant women.) The study has been accepted for publication in the peer reviewed journal Reproductive Toxicology.

According to the UK Daily Mail, this study, which “appears to blow a hole in” safety claims, “has triggered calls for a ban on imports and a total overhaul of the safety regime for genetically modified (GM) crops and food.” Organizations from England to New Zealand are now calling for investigations and for GM crops to be halted due to the serious implications of this finding.

Links to allergies, auto-immune disease, and other disorders

There’s already plenty of evidence that the Bt-toxin produced in GM corn and cotton plants is toxic to humans and mammals and triggers immune system responses. The fact that it flows through our blood supply, and that is passes through the placenta into fetuses, may help explain the rise in many disorders in the US since Bt crop varieties were first introduced in 1996.

In government-sponsored research in Italyii, mice fed Monsanto’s Bt corn showed a wide range of immune responses. Their elevated IgE and IgG antibodies, for example, are typically associated with allergies and infections. The mice had an increase in cytokines, which are associated with “allergic and inflammatory responses.” The specific cytokines (interleukins) that were elevated are also higher in humans who suffer from a wide range of disorders, from arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, to MS and cancer (see chart).

Elevated interleukins Associations
IL-6 Rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis, various types of cancer (multiple myeloma and prostate cancer)
IL-13 Allergy, allergic rhinitis, ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease)
MIP-1b Autoimmune disease and colitis.
IL-12p70 Inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis

The young mice in the study also had elevated T cells (gamma delta), which are increased in people with asthma, and in children with food allergies, juvenile arthritis, and connective tissue diseases. The Bt corn that was fed to these mice, MON 810, produced the same Bt-toxin that was found in the blood of women and fetuses.

When rats were fed another of Monsanto’s Bt corn varieties called MON 863, their immune systems were also activated, showing higher numbers of basophils, lymphocytes, and white blood cells. These can indicate possible allergies, infections, toxins, and various disease states including cancer. There were also signs of toxicity in the liver and kidneys.iii

Natural Bt is dangerous

Farmers have used Bt-toxin from soil bacteria as a natural pesticide for years. But they spray it on plants, where it washes off and biodegrades in sunlight. The GM version is built-in; every plant cell has its own spray bottle. The toxin doesn’t wash off; it’s consumed. Furthermore, the plant-produced version of the poison is thousands of times more concentrated than the spray; is designed to be even more toxic; and has properties of known allergens—it actually fails the World Health Organization’s allergen screening tests.iv

The biotech companies ignore the substantial difference between the GM toxin and the natural bacteria version, and boldly claim that since the natural spray has a history of safe use in agriculture, it’s therefore OK to put the poison directly into our food. But even this claim of safe use of Bt spray ignores peer-reviewed studies showing just the opposite.

When natural Bt-toxin was fed to mice, they had tissue damage, immune responses as powerful as cholera toxinv, and even started reacting to other foods that were formerly harmless.vi Farm workers exposed to Bt also showed immune responses.vii The EPA’s own expert Scientific Advisory Panel said that these mouse and farm worker studies “suggest that Bt proteins could act as antigenic and allergenic sources.”viii But the EPA ignored the warnings. They also overlooked studiesix showing that about 500 people in Washington state and Vancouver showed allergic and flu-like symptoms when they were exposed to the spray when it was used to kill gypsy moths.

Bt cotton linked to human allergies, animal deaths

Indian farm workers are suffering from rashes and itching and other symptoms after coming into contact with Bt cotton.

Now thousands of Indian farm laborers are suffering from the same allergic and flu-like symptoms as those in the Pacific Northwest simply from handling genetically engineered cotton plants that produce Bt-toxin. According to reports and records from doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies, as well as numerous investigative reports and case studies, workers are struggling with constant itching and rashes; some take antihistamines every day in order to go to work.

It gets worse.

All thirteen buffalo of a small Indian village died after grazing for a single day on Bt cotton plants.

When they allow livestock to graze on the Bt cotton plants after harvest, thousands of sheep, goats, and buffalo died. Numerous others got sick. I visited one village where for seven to eight years they allowed their buffalo to graze on natural cotton plants without incident. But on January 3rd, 2008, they allowed their 13 buffalo to graze on Bt cotton plants for the first time. After just one day’s exposure, all died. The village also lost 26 goats and sheep.

One small study in Andhra Pradesh reported that all six sheep that grazed on Bt cotton plants died within a month, while the three controls fed natural cotton plants showed no adverse symptoms.

Living pesticide factories inside us?

Getting back to the Bt-toxin now circulating in the blood of North American adults and newborns—how did it get there? The study authors speculate that it was consumed in the normal diet of the Canadian middle class. They even suggest that the toxin may have come from eating meat from animals fed Bt corn—as most livestock are.

I’d like to speculate on another possible source. But I warn you, it’s not pretty.

The only human feeding study every published on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) was conducted on Roundup Ready soybeans. Here’s their back story: Scientists found bacteria growing in a chemical waste dump near their factory, surviving the presence of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide. The herbicide normally kills bacteria, but this organism had some special gene that allowed it to survive. So Monsanto scientists figured, “Let’s put it into the food supply!”

By forcing that genes from that bacterium into soybean plants’ DNA, the plants then survive an otherwise deadly dose of Roundup herbicide—hence the name Roundup Ready.

In the human studyx, some of the subjects were found to have Roundup Ready gut bacteria! This means that sometime in the past, from eating one or more meals of GM soybeans, the gene that had been discovered in the chemical waste dump and forced into the soy, had transferred into the DNA of bacteria living inside their intestines—and continued to function. That means that long after we stop eating GMOs, we may still have dangerous GM proteins produced continuously inside of us.

When the results of the study emerged, the funding from the pro-GMO UK government mysteriously dried up, so they were not able to see if the same type of gene transfer happens with Bt genes from, say, corn chips. If it does, it means that eating Bt corn might turn our intestinal flora into living pesticide factories—continually manufacturing Bt-toxin from within our digestive systems.

I don’t know of a test that can confirm that this is happening, but the Canada study may be showing the results—where Bt-toxins are found in the blood of a very high percentage of people.

If the “living pesticide factory” hypothesis is correct, we might speculate even further. Bt-toxin breaks open the stomach of insects. Could it similarly be damaging the integrity of our digestive tracts? The biotech companies insist that Bt-toxin doesn’t bind or interact with the intestinal walls of mammals, and therefore humans. But here too they ignore peer-reviewed published evidence showing that Bt-toxin does bind with mouse small intestines and with intestinal tissue from rhesus monkeys.xi In the former study, they even found “changes in the electrophysiological properties” of the organ after the Bt-toxin came into contact.xii

If Bt-toxins were causing leaky gut syndrome in newborns, the passage of undigested foods and toxins into the blood from the intestines could be devastating. Scientists speculate that it may lead to autoimmune diseases and food allergies. Furthermore, since the blood-brain barrier is not developed in newborns, toxins may enter the brain causing serious cognitive problems. Some healthcare practitioners and scientists are convinced that this is the apparent mechanism for autism.

Thus, if Bt genes were colonizing the bacteria living in the digestive tract of North Americans, we might see an increase in gastrointestinal problems, autoimmune diseases, food allergies, and childhood learning disorders—since 1996 when Bt crops came on the market. Physicians have told me that they indeed are seeing such an increase.

The discovery of Bt-toxin in our blood does not confirm all this speculation, but it does provide food for thought. And hopefully, that food is non-GMO.

Our Institute for Responsible Technology joins other organizations worldwide calling for an immediate ban on GM food crops, and the commencement of rigorous independent scientific research on the safety of GMOs in general, and Bt-toxin in particular.

Jeffrey M. Smith is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology, author of the #1 international bestselling book on GMOs, Seeds of Deception, and of Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods. To avoid GMOs, which is the advice of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, visit www.NonGMOShoppingGuide.com.

i Aris A, Leblanc S. Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. Reprod Toxicol (2011), doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338670

ii Finamore A, Roselli M, Britti S, Monastra G, Ambra R, Turrini A and Mengheri E. (2008). Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice. J Agric Food Chem, 16 November 2008

iii Seralini GE, Cellier D, Spiroux de Vendomois J. 2007, “New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity”. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007;52:596-602; and Vendômois, JS, François Roullier, Dominique Cellier and Gilles-Eric Séralini. 2009, “A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health” . International Journal of Biological Sciences 2009; 5(7):706-726

iv Gendel, “The use of amino acid sequence alignments to assess potential allergenicity of proteins used in genetically modified foods,” Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 42 (1998), 45–62. See also: G. A. Kleter and A. A. C. M. Peijnenburg, “Screening of transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino acid sequences indentical to potential, IgE-binding linear epitopes of allergens,” BMC Structural Biology 2 (2002): 8–19; H. P. J. M. Noteborn, “Assessment of the Stability to Digestion and Bioavailability of the LYS Mutant Cry9C Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis serovar tolworthi,” Unpublished study submitted to the EPA by AgrEvo, EPA MRID No. 447343-05 (1998); and H. P. J. M. Noteborn et al, “Safety Assessment of the Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Crystal Protein CRYIA(b) Expressed in Transgenic Tomatoes,” in Genetically modified foods: safety issues, American Chemical Society Symposium Series 605, eds. K.H. Engel et al., (Washington, DC, 1995): 134–47.
Bt protein failed to break down quickly in a simulated digestive solution. In fact, it left fragments that were typically the size of allergens. The Bt also failed the heat stability test, and had shared 9–12 amino acid sequences of vitellogenin, an egg yolk allergen.

v Vazquez et al, “Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal antibody responses in mice,” 1897–1912; Vazquez et al, “Characterization of the mucosal and systemic immune response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33 (2000): 147–155; See also L. Moreno-Fierros, N. Garcia, R. Lopez-Revilla, R. I. Vazquez-Padron, “Intranasal, rectal and intraperitoneal immunization with protoxin Cry1Ac from Bacillus thuringiensis induces compartmentalized serum, intestinal, vaginal, and pulmonary immune responses in Balb/c mice,” Microbes and Infection 2 (2000): 885–90.

vi Vazquez et al, “Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protoxin is a potent systemic and mucosal adjuvant,” Scandanavian Journal ofImmunology 49 (1999): 578–584. See also Vazquez-Padron et al., 147 (2000).

vii I.L. Bernstein et al, “Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides,” Environmental Health Perspectives 107, no. 7(1999): 575–582.

viii EPA Scientific Advisory Panel, “Bt Plant-Pesticides Risk and Benefits Assessments,” March 12, 2001: 76.

ix Washington State Department of Health, “Report of health surveillance activities: Asian gypsy moth control program,” (Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Health, 1993); and M. Green, et al., “Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,” Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848–852.

x Netherwood, T. (2004) “Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract”. Nature Biotechnology, 22, 204-209.

xi Noteborn et al, “Safety Assessment of the Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Crystal Protein CRYIA(b) Expressed in Transgenic Tomatoes,” 134–47.

xii Vazquez et al, “Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kurstaki HD73 binds to surface proteins in the mouse small intestine,” 54–58.

Tags:
  • http://Website anonymous

    Thank you for writing so clearly with documented references.

  • http://Website Snadra

    Thank you for this article. After thinking a bit about it, I’m left wondering what could be done to reverse the growth of the GMO proteins in the gut? Is it as simple as overpopulating with good flora?

    Thank you so much!

    • http://www.sweetnsnappy.com Martha Yanchyshyn

      Something you might try is using a good probiotic and hoping that the good bugs will outcompete the toxic ones. I have been using the one Dr. Mercola offers at http://www.mercola.com for some time to help me to combat my lifelong sugar cravings. Not only has it been very helpful in that respect, I feel, on the whole, better than I’ve ever felt. I also avoid anything with corn or soy in all their many and devious forms, as well as anything else I think may be GMO. This means nearly all processed foods, and I have to know the many aliases for soy. I did eat processed food before becoming aware of how many places it is hiding. You have to read labels relentlessly. The stuff is everywhere!

  • http://Website david

    Is there a way to detoxify yourself with ‘green’ cleanses of this bacteria?

    • http://Website Mike

      Yes, David, go to www dot isagenix dot com and sign up for the Cleanse for Life Pak, which cleanses the body down to the mitochondrial level. To sign on to get it at wholesale, though, you’ll need to go to the one who referred you to their site. I’m more interested in you being able to get it, so you can get back in touch with me at this throwaway address of mine (i.e. LimeOne at me dot com). Once you are signed up with a CostCo-type fee, you will be able to buy it at wholesale. This stuff is good enough by itself, but they have improved it with ionic alfalfa and aloe and will be coming out with the “new and improved” sometime soon. People are losing their unwanted pounds because the liver has encapsulated the toxins with fat to protect you from its deadly effects. Once the cleanse rids the body of the toxins, the body sheds the unneeded fat. My concern about GMO, though, is the stress it is having on your DNA. Isagenix is working on promoting DNA health, but GMO could cripple any efforts in this direction. Thus the need to ban it!

      • http://Website JR

        Body-cleansing to the microbial level is not good for us. Take some burdock. And is this the place for MLM marketing? No.

    • http://Website Jeffrey Smith

      I don’t know of any method to detect or clean up the gut bacteria colonization. Sorry.

  • http://wwatsonweb.co.nz Chris Watson

    There are still unanswered questions as to the effects of addition of genes from anthrax, ceres b, meningitis, hepatitis, staph aureus, (to name a few) to the BtK as mentioned in patent data, said to increase the production of the toxic protein and also increase the antibiotic resistance of the organism. Quorum sensing and the possibility of cross species activation of organisms has also been overlooked.

  • http://Website stevefernandez661

    Everyone needs to call Monsanto and complain: (314) 694-1000

    I did – it was after hours, but i talked to the security guard. He was nice and so was I. I think you can get a lot further with a nice word than being mean. I gave him the cliff notes about the article. Give them information to think about… but if i get to talk to the makers, then Ill tell them where they can go and how to get there!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • http://Website Kathleen

      Be nice to them too or the results will be the opposite of what you want….unfortunately, but that’s the way people work – state how you feel but be respectful :)

  • http://Website Duncan59

    Yes, does anyone think you CAN cleanse this self replicating toxin? Or is it a genetic mutation of our cells, i.e. permanent?

    • http://www.sweetnsnappy.com Martha Yanchyshyn

      I think GMO’s are the worst form of environmental pollution to date because of their ability to self-replicate. This ranks right up there with climate change as one of our two worst threats. Unfortunately, climate change is sometimes used to justify their use, although implementing small-scale organic permaculture methods is far more likely to be a viable response. Unfortunately, this is labor-intensive, and our culture defines “efficiency” as seeing how many people can be eliminated. Most people can’t even grow one food plant, much less manage a complex biodiverse system.

  • http://Website savannah quinn

    I have a question for jeffrey. I get raw milk from a local Amish farmer and just found out they supplement with GMO corn. what kind of damage do you think this does and is it worse than drinking pasteurized milk

  • http://Website floyd

    i love this website and the dedication shown by jeffrey smith.

  • http://Website Jay

    Would this Bt bacteria be in corn syrup or any non-organic corn product?

    Could even a small amount of exposure result in colonization of our digestive track?

    And most importantly, any clue, idea or research on how to cleanse this from our system?

    • http://Website Jeffrey Smith

      There wouldn’t be any Bt toxin or GM genes in corn syrup, as that is too highly processed.

      • http://poetichealing.com JAck Weber

        Jeffrey (and any reader who can help clarify),

        Thanks for the information.

        Alicia, a reader who comments above, cites the study you mention in your article, which says that the GM gene was not transferred to gut flora:

        “As this low level of epsps in the intestinal microflora did not increase after consumption of the meal containing GM soya, we conclude that gene transfer did not occur during the feeding experiment.”

        This statement seems to directly contradict what you state. Can you, or anyone, clarify this apparent contradiction for me please?

        Thank you, Jack

        • http://Website Jeffrey

          There was no increased transfer after one GM soy meal, but 3 of 7 had the gene transferred already from a previous meal. We/they don’t know the conditions for this transfer, but they confirmed that a portion of the gene DID transfer, including the promoter. And the bacteria did not die when exposed to glyphosate (not mentioned in published paper, but in earlier longer one).

  • http://Website wes rude

    It finall appears there is a breakthrough for increasing yield and quality of organic crops without tinkering with DNA of the seed/plant. This technology also has other important uses in medicine and water treatment and is accomplished without use of chemicals.

    http://www.aqualiv.net/technology/technology

    The first trials on rice other than Japan will take place this fall in Kenya

    http://www.aqualiv.net/agsmart

    There is also tremendous response/sales to a facial product just introduce

    http://www.aqualiv.net/infotone-face-mist

  • http://Website LM

    This sounded like a very scientific and well-researched article until I got to the point where it mentioned leaky gut. Leaky gut syndrome is an alternative medicine theory that is not supported by most mainstream allergy doctors. There are plenty of other good theories with more scientific backing and research that explain the tie in between the stomach and conditions such as allergies and other illnesses without having to resort to bringing in ‘leaky gut’ syndrome. Even if you do feel the need to mention it, for credibility sake, ‘leaky gut’ syndrome should be really be referred to as just one theory. I felt the mention in this context greatly degraded the credibility of the rest of the article. It’s a shame, since GM foods and their safety issues are very important topics and I would like to see more doctors and scientists take these issues seriously.

    • http://Website David L

      Seriously? Leaky gut is a functional disorder and can be easily demonstrated by a lactulose/mannitol clearance test. Just because a “mainstream doctor” doesn’t believe something doesn’t mean that cannot be not true.

      • http://Website Ken

        Congratulations, you’ve just discovered the “argument from ignorance” logical fallacy!

  • http://www.australianswantgmfreefood.com Mumof2

    Thankyou for this very logical and simple explanation- will be passing it on

  • http://Website Richard

    If the Bt toxin, which is present in many GM crops,is in your blood or gut, how do you get rid of it?

  • http://Website Marcie

    I know of two great products that, with time, will do a great job of cleaning out toxins in the gut. There are several things that must occur in order to fight the environmental troubles of our time. Our lymphatic system is our septic system of the body. It collects all toxins and eliminates them through our kidneys and skin. It is very important therefore to maintain our kidney health (filtration) and keep our lymphatic systems flowing properly so that toxins can be eliminated and not left infiltrating our cells. Our bodies (cells) were designed to recognize toxins and deal with them. It is only when our cells become weaker than the toxins that this process does not happen naturally. Strengthening our cells even back to a genetic level is imperative. In strengthening our cells and regenerating the body there is no health issue that can not be dealt with. I am a Detoxification Specialist and would be glad to talk with anyone who is concerned with this area and health in general. Marcie@maplenet.net

  • http://Website Tatty

    My problem with this article came immediately as I am familiar with the bacteria (Bacillus thuringiensis) because I am an organic gardener and use it as a an accepted biological control against caterpillars because it is safe for buyer and consumer. I of course would be against GM in all forms and really have no knowledge of modifying seeed with this bacteria but the tone of the article makes it sound like a terrible toxin when many organic growers use it for its safe features which then throws doubt on the whole article for any one who recognises this bacteria s name.

    • http://Website Nicole

      Tatty, obviously you didn’t read the article which explains the difference between sprayed on BT, which degrades in sunlight and washes off of plants and genetically engineered plants that produce BT. Maybe you should read next time before you knock someone’s credibility.

    • http://Website wacha

      tatty, you might have missed a point in the article, it said bt is good used on the plant naturally because it get washed off and later degraded by the sun. in gmo the Bt is in the plant, no way to was it off.Stay organic!

  • http://www.pollyheilmealey.com Polly Heil-Mealey

    Thank you for making this infomation available!

  • http://Website Chris

    Contact your representatives and tell them how you feel about gmos! Demand that they be labeled so that we as human beings who want to function as healthy living beings can have the CHOICE to choose.
    Watch this documentary if you are just beginning to educate yourselves on GMOs: The Future of Food – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnD-DiDRIJA

  • http://Website Alex McGrare

    No wonder I grow my own veggies!
    From Down Under.

  • http://www.novelgraphicnovels.com Steve Edward

    This is an outrage. It’s all very well to try and correct a problem induced in our gut by GMO foods, clothes, etc., but where is the anger????????

    I’ve seen demonstrations, boycotts, letters to the editor, petitions to politicians, and nothing has worked.

    We are still condemned to endure toxins floating in our blood streams and guts.

    Where are the lawsuits against these criminal organizations? Where are the criminal charges against the individuals within these criminal organizations who have deceived the public?

    Where are the criminal prosecutions against the politicians who have taken bribes (vacations, presents, cars, money, from these ) criminal organizations
    to pass legislation allowing these products on the market?

    The regulatory, legislative, and law making apparatus of state are broken, populated by criminals who should be in jails not in the halls of power lording over deceived voters.

    • http://www.sweetnsnappy.com Martha Yanchyshyn

      Don’t forget, Miracle Grow is planning to release a GMO variety of Kentucky Bluegrass to sell to unwitting customers for their lawns this spring. Want your children romping and rolling in that stuff? Want to breathe the nice, fresh small of freshly-mowed grass? Oh, well, who needs skin and lungs?

  • http://Website alicia

    I am trying to get to the bottom of the rhetoric out there that is scaring people. Here the Nature Biotechology article Abstract Jeffery cites:

    Nature Biotechnology 22, 204 – 209 (2004)
    Published online: 18 January 2004 | doi:10.1038/nbt934

    Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract

    Trudy Netherwood1,2, Susana M Martín-Orúe1, Anthony G O’Donnell2, Sally Gockling1,2, Julia Graham1,2, John C Mathers3,4 & Harry J Gilbert1

    Abstract

    The inclusion of genetically modified (GM) plants in the human diet has raised concerns about the possible transfer of transgenes from GM plants to intestinal microflora and enterocytes. The persistence in the human gut of DNA from dietary GM plants is unknown. Here we study the survival of the transgene epsps from GM soya in the small intestine of human ileostomists (i.e., individuals in which the terminal ileum is resected and digesta are diverted from the body via a stoma to a colostomy bag). The amount of transgene that survived passage through the small bowel varied among individuals, with a maximum of 3.7% recovered at the stoma of one individual. The transgene did not survive passage through the intact gastrointestinal tract of human subjects fed GM soya. Three of seven ileostomists showed evidence of low-frequency gene transfer from GM soya to the microflora of the small bowel before their involvement in these experiments. As this low level of epsps in the intestinal microflora did not increase after consumption of the meal containing GM soya, we conclude that gene transfer did not occur during the feeding experiment.

    Please read the bottom: As this low level of epsps in the intestinal microflora did not increase after consumption of the meal containing GM soya, we conclude that gene transfer did not occur during the feeding experiment.

    Importantly it is very possible the BT toxin can be retained by the liver and kidney systems as they are filters for our body BUT the notion of having bacteria produce the toxin internally has not been proved.

    Nature Biotechnology is a VERY high level journal and a good source of info. Buy the article and read it. If you want more info.

  • http://Website Tony Frith

    I am a vet and over the last 40years have noticed an increase in skin disease in dogs especially. Does anyone have any data on use of GM modified raw materials in dog foods or similar products?

    • http://Website Jack Weber

      Tony, I do not. But I have speculated the same. We know that the vast majority of ingredients in pet food is commercial, and often the lowest grade commercial, so I’d imagine that pet foods are full of GMO’s and perhaps the Bt toxin. As a vet, why not take on the investigation yourself and publish something? We need all of us to step up our contribution to sanity. Cheers…Jack

      • http://Website tony frith

        Time and Money my dear friend. I made the comment to Jeff when researching another project which might give me both. Hope springs eternal.
        Perhaps you could be the angel investor I have been searching for? Arohanui, Tony

  • http://Website mike hurcum

    By products of GM corn are every where in our food. Can any of you be very definitive and say that every re manufacturing of GM corm removes all traces of Bt from the corn products. Is the air around ethanol plants free of any trace of Bt. Are soda pops drinks free from Bt. Is there absolutely no chance that Bt does not under heat become more virulent. Do not expect the truth from governments or multinationals since they never publish the results of their tesating

  • http://Website Jenny

    Vote Obama out!

    He appointed Michael Taylor, former Monsanto Vice President, our food safety czar! Several other former Monsanto employees are in his administration as well.

  • http://Website Uncle B

    Reports now of super-worms, immune to the poisons even in the crops, eating the roots of the corn plants. Good God. Forgive the fools, they had no idea! All this was to enhance your great garden, the U.S.A., now we have set loose a plague of poisoned plants on our land that we cannot control – much like our nuclear aspirations, bringing deadly humanocidal plutonium and reactor wastes in to being, even as we speak, the Chinese show us the way through T|horium fueled LFTR reactors. reactors we knew about, but chose to pursue the humanocidal route for war. We deserve the depression, the very destruction you bring on our land for these sins. Too late for repentance and forgiveness, you have passed the torch to the Asians. It is done.

  • http://Website JR

    Just received my FDA updates, and see how fast they’re moving on labelling foods gluten-free. Why is that? Who is the power behind quick action on gluten and not GMO labelling? (I’m really asking).

    • http://www.sweetnsnappy.com Martha Yanchyshyn

      Money is the answer. The companies that make/sell this stuff don’t want to know what’s bad about it, and the public doesn’t want to pay the taxes to have it tested, even if the gov agencies weren’t corrupt. It took more than 30 years to establish that female hormone replacement therapy derived from pregnant mare urine caused the problems it was advertised to prevent. But on self-replicating organisms, the threat is much greater because just stopping growing them will not be enough. It’s great that Jeffrey has accepted this challenge!

  • http://Website anon e mouse

    If ever there was justification for an assassination it would be for the CEO of Monsanto. By the time this genocidal corporation is gone they’ll have killed more than Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined.
    If there are any terrorists out there planning to attack the US why not fly your planes into Monsanto’s HQ.
    Seriously though, Monsanto is just pure evil

Stay Informed!

Get our FREE new Newsletter